Contributing

Which cases are related to fundamental rights?

Which cases are related to fundamental rights?

Important judgments on fundamental rights

  • The Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya & Ors.
  • Union of India & Ors. v. Lt.
  • State of Jharkhand & Ors. v.
  • Siddaraju v. State of Karnataka.
  • Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India.
  • Arnab Ranjan Goswami v. Union of India.
  • Prathvi Raj Chouhan v. Union of India.

What significant court cases have used the 14th Amendment?

10 Supreme Court cases about the 14th Amendment

  • Plessy v. Ferguson (18 May 1896) ―The Louisiana legislature had passed a law requiring black and white residents to ride separate, but equal, train cars.
  • Lochner v.
  • Gitlow v.
  • Brown v.
  • Mapp v.
  • Gideon v.
  • Griswold v.
  • Loving v.

Which case is known as fundamental case?

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Anr. (Writ Petition (Civil) 135 of 1970), also known as the Kesavananda Bharati judgement, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that outlined the basic structure doctrine of the Indian Constitution.

What was Berubari case?

Berubari case was the Presidential Reference Under Art. 143(1) of the Constitution of India on the implementation of the Indo-Pak agreement relating to Berubari union and exchange of enclaves which come up for consideration by a bench consisting of eight judges headed by B.P. Sinha, C.J.

What is different about the 18th and 21st amendments?

The movement reached its apex in 1919 when Congress ratified the 18th Amendment, prohibiting the manufacture, transportation and sale of intoxicating liquors. In 1933, widespread public disillusionment led Congress to ratify the 21st Amendment, which repealed Prohibition.

What is the most interesting court case?

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

  • Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
  • Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
  • Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
  • Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
  • Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
  • Roe v. Wade (1973)
  • Impact on History. These are just a few of the famous Supreme Court cases that molded the U.S. into what it is today.
  • Who is Carolyn Whitener?

    #TrailblazerTuesday Carolyn Whitener was a small business owner and college student at Oklahoma State University, and took on Oklahoma’s state government – and won. Whitener brought suit against the state for a law allowing women to purchase beer at 18 years of age but requiring men to be 21.

    Who won the Rostker v Goldberg Case 1981?

    Rostker, Director of the Selective Service System.) In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that this gender distinction was not a violation of the equal protection component of the due process clause, and that the Act would stand as passed.

    What is an example of a fundamental right?

    Laws encroaching on a fundamental right generally must pass strict scrutiny to be upheld as constitutional. Examples of fundamental rights not specifically listed in the Constitution include: interstate travel. Even when the Supreme Court finds that something is a fundamental right, the Court may later revoke its standing as a fundamental right.

    Can a law made by the Parliament infringe the fundamental rights?

    The Apex court held that law made by the Parliament shall not be such that infringes and takes away the fundamental rights of the citizen which are provided by the Constitution of India. Law made by a Parliament in a law under Article 13 of the Constitution. Further, the constitution can be amended. The judgement was overruled by 24 th amendment.

    What is the basic understanding of the constitutional law?

    A basic understanding of the Constitutional Law is a must for every individual. The Constitution of India is the supreme law of the country. It includes the fundamental principles governing the Union and its territories; states and various rights; Executive, legislature and the judiciary; Emergency provisions, etc.

    Are fundamental rights amendable under Article 13?

    The Supreme Court contended that Fundamental Rights are not amendable as stated under Article 13 and also stated that Article 368 gives the procedure to amend the Constitution but does not confer on Parliament the power to amend the Constitution.