Is AMD FX 6300 a good processor?
Is AMD FX 6300 a good processor?
Still, as a budget alternative, the FX-6300 is a very capable CPU offering decent multi-threaded performance, even at stock speed for use in productivity-related tasks and improved gaming performance too.
What is AMD FX 6300 vishera?
The AMD FX-6300 is a desktop processor with 6 cores, launched in October 2012. It is part of the FX lineup, using the Vishera architecture with Socket AM3+. FX-6300 has 8MB of L3 cache and operates at 3.5 GHz by default, but can boost up to 4.1 GHz, depending on the workload.
Is FX-6300 better than i5?
On the other hand, the FX 6300 scored a solid 7,541 points in PassMark’s overclocked benchmark, which is an outstanding 2,100 point advantage over the Intel chip. But since the Intel Core i5 3570K is twice the price of its competition, the AMD FX 6300 is recommended as the smarter choice.
Does the FX-6300 have 6 cores?
The 6-Core FX 6300 3.5 GHz Processor from AMD is a six-core desktop processor with 6MB L2 and 8MB L3 cache. It is capable of handling multiple intensive apps and features a speed frequency of 3.5 GHz to 4.1 GHz….AMD 6300 Specs.
| Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
|---|---|
| L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Is a FX-6300 good for streaming?
FX-6300 should have no problems streaming 1080p / 30 fps if it’s a dedicated streaming PC and the game is being played with a secondary computer. No reason to go 1080p / 60 fps since flash tends to suck playing back a stream like that. A capture card is not really necessary if you are streaming with two PC’s.
What is the AMD FX-6300 processor?
The AMD FX-6300 is a desktop processor with 6 cores, launched in October 2012. It is part of the FX lineup, using the Vishera architecture with Socket AM3+. FX-6300 has 8MB of L3 cache and operates at 3.5 GHz by default, but can boost up to 4.1 GHz, depending on the workload.
How good is the AMD FX 6-core processor?
Where the FX 6-Core lacks is in the area of single core performance which although not normally a major problem for server workloads, is always very relevant to desktop users. The overall performance of the FX 6-Core is comparable to Intel’s five years younger Core i7-950.
Is the AMD FX-8350 a good choice for a server?
Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The 8350 is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition.
How does the AMD FX-8350 compare to the Intel i5-2500k?
The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%.